September 21, 2020, Christopher D. Carroll Aggregation
Consider an economy populated by a set of agents distributed uniformly along
the unit interval with a total population mass of 1. That is, for the
probability distribution function is
and
elsewere; the CDF
on the
interval is therefore
, implying an aggregate population
mass of
.
Agent ’s value of variable
at date
is
. Thus aggregate
consumption is
| (1) |
and a similar notation applies to other variables.
Since the aggregate population is normalized to 1, capital letters refer not only to aggregate variables but also to per capita variables, since per-capita consumption is aggregate consumption divided by aggregate population:
| (2) |
Each individual agent is infinitesimally small, and can therefore neglect the effects of its own actions on aggregates.
For many purposes the assumption that economic agents live forever is useful; but for other purposes it is necessary to be able to analyze agents with finite horizons. Blanchard (1985) introduced a tractable framework that permits analysis of many of the key issues posed by finite lifetimes.
The key assumption is that the probability of death is independent of the agent’s age. (This is similar to the Calvo (1983) assumption that the probability that a firm will change its prices is independent of the time elapsed since the last price change).
The most convenient formulation of the model is one in which the number of dying individuals is always equal to the number of newborn individuals, so that the population remains constant.
As above, suppose that the population alive at time is arranged on
the unit interval. The probability of death is
(and the probability
of not dying is
). Then for a person living at any location
, expected remaining lifetime including the current period will
be
| (3) |
If a new cohort of size has been born each period since the beginning of
time, the total population will be given by the size of a new cohort
multiplied by the expected lifetime
:
| (4) |
so that the mass of the aggregate population is constant at 1, as above.
Blanchard’s original treatment was in continuous time, with a
constant rate of death , so that the probability of remaining
alive (not dead) after
periods for a consumer born in period 0
is1
| (5) |
so that the expected life span is
| (6) |
and if the flow arrival rate of new population is (that is, at each instant a
flow of new population arrives at rate
) then again the population mass is
constant at
| (7) |
Now suppose that the population in the discrete-time model is growing by a
factor from period to period; if the number of newborns
in period 0 was 1, then the number of newborns in period
is given
by
| (8) |
In this framework we want to keep track of the relative population of each
cohort compared to the size of the newborn cohort. At age , the cohort that
was born in period 0 will be of relative size
| (9) |
The total relative populations will be
| (10) |
so that if in period 0 the population was of size then the sizes of the
relative populations will add up to one even as the absolute population grows by
the factor
.