September 21, 2020, Christopher D. Carroll HallJorgenson
| (1) |
and which obtains its capital from a market in which a unit of capital can be
rented for a unit of time at rate
.
In period , the firm maximizes profit,
max kt ktα − ϰ tkt |
yielding first order conditions
| (2) |
What determines the cost of capital? In the simple case with no taxes and no
capital market frictions of any kind, an investor must be indifferent between
putting his money in the bank and earning interest at rate , and buying a
unit of capital, renting it out at rate
, and then reselling it the next
period.
The price at which capital goods can be bought at date is:
| (3) |
and in continuous time, the rate of change of is
. Assume that capital
depreciates geometrically at rate
. The net profit from the continuous time
purchase-and-rent strategy is
|
Thus, the no-arbitrage condition is
| (4) |
Now to simplify our lives we will assume constant capital goods prices,
. Thus, substituting the value for
from (4) into (2) we have:
| (5) |
Now let’s introduce taxes, defined as follows:
|
The net, discounted, after-tax price of capital to the firm is1
| (6) |
Now let’s rewrite the arbitrage equation (4) taking account of taxes:
| (7) |
If we simplify again by assuming that , we have
| (8) |
Note that so far we have not derived a formula for investment - we have
derived a formula for the level of the capital stock. But net investment is just the
difference between the capital stock in periods and
. Thus, the
Hall-Jorgenson model of gross investment is
| (9) |
(where we neglect some minor complications having to do with the distinction between continuous and discrete time).
Hall, Robert E., and Dale Jorgenson (1967): “Tax Policy and Investment Behavior,” American Economic Review, 57, Available at http://www.stanford.edu/~rehall/Tax-Policy-AER-June-1967.pdf.