February 8, 2021, Christopher D. Carroll C-CAPM
Consider a representative agent solving the joint consumption and portfolio allocation problem:
|
where denotes the return on a perfectly riskless asset and
denotes the return on asset
between periods
and
,
is the
share of end-of-period savings invested in asset
, and
is the
portfolio-weighted rate of return, and
is noncapital income in period
.
As usual, the objective can be rewritten in recursive form:
| (1) |
The first order condition with respect to is
| (2) |
and the FOC with respect to is
| (3) |
But the usual logic of the Envelope theorem tells us that
| (4) |
so, substituting (4) into (2) and (3) we have
| (5) |
Now assume CRRA utility, and divide both sides of (5)
by
to get
| (6) |
We can now follow the same steps as in the ‘Equity Premium Puzzle’ handout
to obtain the relation that for every asset
| (7) |
What does this imply about asset pricing?
Consider an asset for which the return covaries positively with consumption,
. For such an asset, the marginal utility will
negatively covary with the return. Thus the expected return must be higher for
an asset that ‘does well’ when consumption is high. But for a given average
stream of dividends or payouts, if the average return is high, the average
price must be low. Thus this indicates that prices should be low for
assets whose payoffs are procyclical, and high for assets whose payoffs are
countercylical.